A Comparison of Two HPE Aruba Access Points: Q9H62A and R2H28A
HPE Aruba is a leading provider of networking solutions for enterprises and small businesses. HPE Aruba offers a wide range of access points that cater to different needs and budgets. In this article, we will compare two HPE Aruba access points: Q9H62A and R2H28A. We will look at their features, specifications, and use cases.
Q9H62A
The Q9H62A is a wireless access point with Bluetooth 5.0 and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) technology. It is part of the Aruba 510 Series Campus Access Points that provide high-performance connectivity for any organization experiencing growing numbers of IoT and mobility requirements. It has a combined peak data rate of up to 2.69 Gbps, delivering the speed and reliability needed for any enterprise environment1.
The Q9H62A access point is designed to optimize user experience by maximizing Wi-Fi efficiency and dramatically reducing airtime contention between clients. Features include Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA), multi-user MIMO and cellular optimization. With up to 4 spatial streams (4SS) and 160 MHz channel bandwidth (VHT160), the Q9H62A access point provides groundbreaking wireless capabilities for any enterprise1.
The Q9H62A access point supports full IEEE 802.3at Power over Ethernet Plus (PoE+) with 30W power on all copper ports1. It also supports digital diagnostics monitoring via a 2-wire serial interface, as specified in SFF-84722. The access point is compliant with SFF-8431, SFF-8432 and IEEE 802.3ae standards2.
The Q9H62A access point is compatible with a wide range of HPE Aruba switches, such as the 2930M, 6200F, 6200M, 6300, 6405, and CX 8360 series1. It can enable uniform wired-wireless policy enforcement, application visibility, flexibility, and application optimization. It can also support advanced IP routing features such as Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM), and IPv6 routing1.
R2H28A
The R2H28A is a wireless access point with Bluetooth 5.0 and Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) technology. It is part of the Aruba AP-635 Series Campus Access Points that provide high-performance connectivity for any organization experiencing growing numbers of IoT and mobility requirements. It has a combined peak data rate of up to 3.9 Gbps, delivering the speed and reliability needed for any enterprise environment3.
The R2H28A access point is designed to optimize user experience by maximizing Wi-Fi efficiency and dramatically reducing airtime contention between clients. Features include Orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA), multi-user MIMO and cellular optimization. With up to 4 spatial streams (4SS) and 160 MHz channel bandwidth (VHT160), the R2H28A access point provides groundbreaking wireless capabilities for any enterprise3.
The R2H28A access point supports full IEEE 802.3at Power over Ethernet Plus (PoE+) with 30W power on all copper ports3. It also supports digital diagnostics monitoring via a 2-wire serial interface, as specified in SFF-8472. The access point is compliant with SFF-8402 and IEEE 802.3by standards.
The R2H28A access point is compatible with a wide range of HPE Aruba switches, such as the CX 6100, CX 6200, CX 6300, and CX 6400 series3. It can enable uniform wired-wireless policy enforcement, application visibility, flexibility, and application optimization. It can also support advanced IP routing features such as EIGRP, OSPF, BGP, PIM, and IPv6 routing3.
Conclusion
The two HPE Aruba access points compared in this article are Q9H62A and R2H28A. They have different features, specifications, and use cases. The Q9H62A is a wireless access point with Bluetooth 5.0 and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) technology that provides high-speed short-range communication over the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. The R2H28A is a wireless access point with Bluetooth 5.0 and Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) technology that provides high-speed short-range communication over the 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands. Depending on the network requirements and budget, one of these access points may be more suitable than the other.
Comments
Post a Comment